The Commission
puts industry centre stage and reinforces competitiveness in an enlarged
European Union,
Brussels, 20 April 2004
After relaunching of the debate on the role of industrial policy in
December 2002, the European Commission sketches the contours of an industrial
policy for an enlarged European Union in a Communication adopted today. This
responds to the concerns raised by the European Council and also responds to
concerns about the risk of deindustrialisation and how we can anticipate and
address on-going structural changes within European industry. The Commission
calls for action in three areas: a better regulatory environment for business,
including action to avoid over-regulation at EU or national level, better
mobilising all EU policy to boost competitiveness particularly through action
in areas like research, training, competition rules and regional aid, and
working with individual sectors to develop polices responses which match
specific needs, move up the value chain, anticipate and accompany structural
transformations. Action in these areas will be implemented in the context of
new financial perspectives up to 2013, which place particular emphasis on
competitiveness. Finally, this Communication also provides a point of
departure. Its analysis and recommendations will be important for the on-going
review of the Lisbon strategy and the work of the high level group looking at
Lisbon chaired by Wim Kok. A further Communication adopted today stresses that
a pro-active competition policy is a key element of a coherent and integrated
policy to foster the competitiveness of Europe's industries. It sets out how
the Commission intends to take forward its new pro-active approach to
competition on the eve of enlargement.
"A
year and half ago we relaunched the debate on the role of industry and how EU
policy can help" said Erkki Liikanen, European Commissioner for Enterprise
and the Information Society. "Today we are setting out the steps needed to
allow industry to achieve its full potential in an enlarged European Union. It
must continue to be a motor for jobs, innovation and growth. We need to make
sure that all our policies are working to support competitiveness and we need
to be more aware of the cumulative effects of piling up regulation on businesses.
We have also looked at the concerns raised about deindustrialisation. This is
not yet a major problem in the Union and the steps we are launching today
should make sure it not a problem in the future."
"Pro-active
competition policy means that the Commission streamlines its regulatory
proceedings. We have already facilitated pan-European merger approvals in an
enlarged Union. We have now embarked on cutting down the administrative red
tape still involved in State aid control", stated Competition Commissioner
Mario Monti.
An
industrial policy for an enlarged European Union
European
industry on the eve of enlargement has many strengths, but is also
underperforming in key areas of productivity, innovation and research spending.
While there is no general phenomenon of deindustrialisation and most industrial
sectors are actually witnessing increased production, there is an on-going
process of restructuring in Europe. This involves a shift in resources and jobs
towards activities with high "knowledge" content. This process brings
benefits, but can prove painful as the costs sometimes fall on specific sectors
or regions, while the benefits are spread more widely. Moreover, competition
from third countries, such as China or India, is a further factor in this transition
process.
Enlargement
too is important in this context. It offers European industry important
opportunities in terms of investment, skills and new markets, but these can
only be seized if the process of restructuring is not blocked by artificial barriers.
Moreover, enlargement may help in some cases to maintain production in the EU,
which might otherwise have moved to Asia. It will also boost competitiveness by
allowing businesses to re-organise their activities between existing and new
Member States, so that they benefit from the competitiveness strengths and
advantages of different parts of the Union. Our neighbourhood policy can also
play a role by extending the reach of the internal market to neighbouring
countries.
All this
highlights the importance of anticipating these changes, and pursuing the
policies needed to support them. Action at an EU level should, in particular,
focus in three areas:
·
Improving the regulatory environment. The
Commission is moving forward with its "Better Lawmaking" Action Plan,
while looking out for ways of improving its approach. This includes taking
better account of the "competitiveness" dimension in assessing the
impact of its proposals and providing a better assessment of the cumulative
impact of regulation on specific industries.
A
proactive competition policy
The
Communication describes the contribution to competitiveness made by the full
range of competition policy instruments, i.e. antitrust, merger control,
liberalisation and State aid control. It seeks to pursue a proactive approach
which means:
·
an improvement of the regulatory framework for competition
which facilitates business activity, wide dissemination of knowledge and
efficient economic restructuring;
The
Communication summarises the recent and ongoing comprehensive reform of EU
competition law and shows how a pro-active enforcement practice contributes
with streamlined procedures and a more economic approach to removing
administrative burdens from business, in particular small and medium-sized
enterprises, and to allowing the Commission to free resources in order to focus
on the most serious and damaging competition problems, notably cartels,
competition in liberalised utility sectors, liberal professions and financial
services. It also describes the specific contribution of State aid policy to
competitiveness.
Also, in
conducting its State aid policy the Commission is taking an economic approach.
Since the late 1990s the Commission has increasingly re-oriented its State aid
policy toward cases and issues of real significance for the internal market and
EU industry, i.e., to instances where the Commission can really make a
difference or bring added value. On the other hand, it has tried not to be
burdened down with issues and cases where this is not the case.
The
Communication can be found at:
http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/enterprise_policy/industry/2004communication.htm