Mr Erkki Liikanen
Member of the European Commission, responsible for Enterprise and the
Information Society "Creating a predictable legal environment for
competitive and innovative electronic communications in the European
Union" Public hearing on remedies under the new regulatory framework for
electronic communications networks and services Brussels, 26th
January 2004
1. Welcome
I am pleased to see so many of you
here today to discuss the important issue of remedies. Today's discussion will
help shape the final remedies document, and as such, it represents an important
opportunity to participate in this process.
I am happy to welcome my colleague
Mario Monti. We, and our services, have been working very closely together on
the new legal environment for electronic communications in Europe. The new
framework has a strong link with competition law principles.
2. Background
As we begin 2004 there are some
indications that the downturn the ICT sector in particular, is ending.
Broadband is making impressive
strides and is becoming one of the fastest growing new markets.
Convergence is about to become a
reality for consumers. In 1998 the commission published a Green paper on
convergence as a starting point for the new regulatory framework. Now we are beginning
to see the reality in the marketplace. TV is being delivered over broadband
networks, and new mobile phones allow you to watch a replay of your favourite
goal. This process is creating new opportunities for the sector.
This convergence highlights the need
for interoperability of all layers. This is an area where industry needs to
take the lead, but where public authorities need to be alert to market
failures. This we recognised in the Communication on Open Platforms (sept. '03)
Becoming a dynamic knowledge based
economy is the goal for the EU. The European model - of a market based economy
with built-in safeguards to promote equity - can only be sustained by
productivity growth.
There is a growing body of evidence
on the critical role that early adoption of ICT plays in achieving sustained
growth in productivity. This explains partly the recent divergence in EU and US
productivity growth rates.
But when you look at the sector
figures, there are also good stories. The telecommunication services sector has
had a much stronger productivity growth in the EU than in the US.
Liberalisation and mobile communications have played an important role here.
In un-picking the truth behind the
some of the myths surrounding "the real new economy" Diane Farrell, writing
in the Harvard Business review, notes that:
"An important dynamic of the new
economy…is the virtuous cycle of competition, innovation and productivity
growth - In sectors where competition was promoted innovation flourished and
productivity soared."
3. Philosophy behind
the New Regulatory Framework
Our task is to deliver a predictable
legal environment. This is required to give sufficient certainty to investors
to make critical investments in new facilities that will generate greater
competition.
This requires that the framework is
conceptually clear. The use of Competition Law principles in imposing
obligations on SMP operators - and the role of the Article 7 Taskforce are
critical in this regard. The final piece of this complex task is delivered in
draft form in the joint paper. Today by your input - you will help to ensure
that conceptual clarity will also be achieved in relation to remedies.
Competition is the key driver in
delivering greater choice, quality, innovation and service at lower prices.
Competition is the means to ensure that consumer's interests are at the heart
of new framework.
The new regulatory framework
recognises that consumers buy services rather than technologies. Hence the
importance of technological neutrality.
The new regulatory framework also
recognises that ICT is a dynamic and innovative area. Disruptive technologies
have the potential to undermine previously unassailable market positions.
Hence, the new regulatory framework involves forward-looking analysis and periodic
reviews. It is not a one-shot game.
The new regulatory framework
represents an important opportunity to re-focus regulation on areas where the
markets actually fail. This is a critical philosophical underpinning of the new
framework - regulation should only be used to address an identified market
failure.
Of course, regulation is also used to
achieve other "over-arching" public policy goals such as universal
service.
3.1 Transition to
infrastructure competition
Regulation that tackles market power
must be withdrawn once sustainable effective competition becomes established.
Thus regulation, insofar as possible, is also a means to support the transition
from a situation of market failure to one of effective competition.
Let's be clear. To have competition
over infrastructure tomorrow we need service competition today. We all agree
that, where it is feasible, infrastructure competition delivers tangible real
additional benefits. For this to become a reality, companies must be allowed to
compete at the outset using elements of the incumbent's infrastructure.
However, a delicate balance has to be
struck. New entrants must be allowed access to the incumbent's infrastructure.
However, it must also be the case that they continually strive to reduce this dependence
wherever feasible.
The key is to ensure that new
entrants have incentives to make incremental investments in their own
infrastructure
In this case, NRAs will have to make
sure that the remedies that they impose create an incentive structure that
supports this important process.
Sometimes competition between
infrastructures is not feasible in the short term. These circumstances need to
be identified and regulated accordingly. NRAs will need to outline where they
believe the boundaries between replicable and non-replicable infrastructure
lie.
This will be a complex exercise. It
is also a moving target, as new technology will over time make replication
possible where it was not before.
What will be left in this
"box" of non-replicable infrastructure will be that infrastructure
that will for a time be subject to on-going regulation. In these areas,
incumbents must be adequately rewarded to ensure that they continue to have
incentives to invest. This investment will be required both to upgrade and maintain
existing facilities.
There will be some areas where these
questions of replicability cannot be immediately resolved to a sufficient
degree of certainty. In these so-called "grey areas" caution needs to
be exercised so as not to preclude the possibility of replication becoming a
viable option in the future.
3.2 Emerging markets
Under the new regulatory framework an
important principle is that regulation will only be applied to enduring market
failures. For this reason, specific allowance is made for emerging markets.
An emerging market exists when a new
service is offered to consumers that in the eyes of consumers cannot be
substituted by currently existing services. Nor can existing firms supply this
service using current technology.
As a general principle, emerging
markets should be allowed to develop according to market forces. Thus, for the
most part, any potential market abuse should be dealt with under standard
Competition Law.
Encouraging efficient investment by
incumbents and new entrants and promoting innovation are explicit objectives
under the new regulatory framework. Investors need to obtain an adequate return
in light of the risks they take. These concerns arise particularly when we
consider emerging markets.
We need to balance the interest that
consumers have in additional competition today versus the incentive that
investors have to make risky investments in an unproven area. This is a
trade-off that society often faces in areas such as patents.
In emerging markets it is likely that
the leading firm will, at the outset, enjoy a large market share. However,
absent some significant entry barrier, such an advantage is likely not to last
long. In such a market it is often dangerous to infer enduring market power
based on today's market shares.
Whilst there should be no presumption
that market power on a related market can be leveraged onto an emerging market,
such leveraging can of course occur.
A distinction can be made on the
basis of whether non-replicable legacy infrastructure elements are used or not.
4. Conclusion
You are here today to participate in
a discussion on the joint document on remedies.
This is a critical element in
ensuring the consistent application in a transparent manner - of the new
regulatory framework throughout the EU.
An important part of this process is
the obligation on NRAs to seek to agree on the remedies best suited to address
particular types of situations in the market place.
The European Regulators Group has a
central role to play in this regard and the draft paper on remedies is an
integral part of this process. I would like to take this opportunity to thank
the European Regulators Group for the effort and urgency that it has given to
this process.
I use the word process advisedly as
this is indeed a process of seeking to agree and of building consensus.
I hope that the discussion today will
highlight areas where you the participants - think that more "seeking to
agree" may be required.
Thank you